Should the improvements I put into my car be included in the value paid by insurance company?
Question Details: We paid nearly $30,000 in improvements in this vehicle, including an upgraded transmission and other motor work. Insurance company is offering book value of the vehicle only.
They should pay the then-current value of the car including improvements, which (due to depreciation, etc.) will be less than the cost to make those improvements, but will still increase the car's value over baseline book. Not all work is an "improvement": repairs, even if necessary, are not. And idiosyncratic "improvements" which you like but which would not make the car sell for more to most people (e.g. since most people do NOT like tinted windows, there is a good chance that tinted windows would not add value.) Only things which would increase the sale price of the car were you to buy it with those improvements are things which should (subject again to depreciation) increase what you receive. You'd also have to document not just the initial cost but what they value add now would be. If they adamantly refuse to compensate you for improvements which added value, your recourse, if you think they are short changing you, would be to sue for "breach of contract" (an insurance policy is a contract) and prove in court that under the terms of your policy, they are offering less for your car than it was in fact worth.