Is it medcial malpractice to release a mother from the hospital after a "C" section without a bowel movement?
Question Details: About 6 hours after release, the mother ended up in the E.R. with extreme stomach pains. The E.R. stated the only option was to put a tube down her nose to suck out air from stomach, only to have a suppository 2 days later and gas/bowel to be moved.
Whether this is malpractice or not is really more of a medical or legal question in a way. The legal definition of malpractice is medical care that is careless or negligent, or does not reach contemporary/current expectations or standards for such care. So the question becomes, was it careless to let her go home then? Are doctors supposed to wait for a bowel movement before releasing her? Would the average reasonable doctor have let her go home at that time, given the condition she appeared to be in?
If a reasonable doctor would let her go home under those conditions, then even though she ended up having difficulty, there would be no malpractice; the doctor, in doing what was expected, did nothing wrong.
If the average reasonable doctor, however, would not have let her go home then, then this may well have been malpractice.
So the question is: what should they have done? And that question is answered by other doctors, with reference to the guidelines or standards for care in this situation. What have other doctors said about the level or standard of care, or about whether she should hae been released?