Helping 20 Million Americans a Year for 20 Years. FREE!
Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential

Call us today for a free consultation (855) 466-5776

Does my case qualify as medical malpractice if I had an infection that was not diagnosed and treated?

Question Details: About 10 days ago, I received an lumbar puncture. Everything went fine, however the next day my back pain was so severe that I could barely walk, so I went to the ER. The PA who was assigned to me asked me if I had a headache and asked me to rate my pain on a scale of 1-10. I told him, "My headache is about a 2 and my back pain is an 8 or 9". Blood and urine was collected and the PA ordered a medication specifically for headaches. I got nothing for the back pain. Throughout my stay, I complained numerous times about my back but I was never given relief. The thing that makes me think I may have a malpractice case on my hands is that the PA came back after a few hours and told me, "All your labs are perfectly fine". However, a day later, I checked online on the patient portal and reviewed the results from the visit and there were many abnormalities that signified an infection. About a week later, I ended up going to another hospital and was told I had a pretty bad bacterial infection. I went to my primary to follow up and she also said it was bad and that it did in fact spread because I was having severe pain in other areas. I was prescribed oral and topical antibiotics. Had the PA at the hospital informed me of my abnormal lab results, I would have avoided the spread of my bacterial skin infection and severe pain and other symptoms that affected my day-to-day activities. Do I have a malpractice case?

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.