Helping 20 Million Americans a Year for 20 Years. FREE!
Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Find the Right Lawyer for Your Legal Issue!

Fast, Free, and Confidential

Call us today for a free consultation (855) 466-5776

What is the best defense to get 2 strict liability tickets dismissed?

Question Details: I'm at a loss right now. I pled not guilty to 2 citations that I received, 1 for driving into or stopping within 500 ft of a fire apparatus and 1 for driving over an uprotected fire hose. Long story short, fire apparatus was parked parallel to sidewalk opposite direction of oncoming traffic. In the blocking position the fire apparatus had it's mounted white spotlights turned on and emmitting to the front of the truck. In a quiet nieghborhood in the middle of the night, I was traveling towards the fire vehicle not known to me at this time that it was a fire truck all I could see was the white steady spotlights, limited visibility at least 500 feet out and not able to see any of the emergency lights red/amber because of the white flood lights. I slowed down to drive around the white lights to discover when my field of view came back by getting out if the spotlights that I was next to a fire truck and ran over the unprotected road. If I had been able to see emergency warning lights and knew it was a fire truck I would have never driven through that. Is there any chance of a defense on this type if ticket in regards to the fire crew blinding oncoming traffic with their white lights? No firefighter was injured or killed. I was travelling approximately 8 mph when I was at the front edge of the firetruck. I have police body cam and my own vehicle cam footage that shows the intensity of the white flood lights and how the emergency lights are not visible.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The Answer(s) provided above are for general information only. The attorney providing the answer was not serving as the attorney for the person submitting the question or in any attorney-client relationship with such person. Laws may vary from state to state, and sometimes change. Tiny variations in the facts, or a fact not set forth in a question, often can change a legal outcome or an attorney's conclusion. Although has verified the attorney was admitted to practice law in at least one jurisdiction, he or she may not be authorized to practice law in the jurisdiction referred to in the question, nor is he or she necessarily experienced in the area of the law involved. Unlike the information in the Answer(s) above, upon which you should NOT rely, for personal advice you can rely upon we suggest you retain an attorney to represent you.